I [Jonathan Whitcomb] interviewed Susan Wooten,by email in 2007, about her sighting of an apparentpterosaur that flew over a highway that ran by aswamp in South Carolina. She told me “It looked asbig as any car, and had NO feathers, not like a hugecrane or egret.” With a wingspan that she estimatedat 12-20 feet, the creature glided over the highway,passing close to her car: about twenty feet high andtwenty-five feet in front of her car.The sighting by Wooten was at about 3:00 p.m.between Greenville and Florence, South Carolina.The visibility was clear. She was following a friendwho was driving in a car ahead (the second womandid not notice anything, for the apparent pterosaurhad flown behind that second car).Several things caught my attention. Wooten’s sketchof the pterosaur (“pterodactyl” is the common word)showed a very long tail and legs. She was sure thatwhat she interpreted as a tail was indeed a tail andthat she saw the legs separately. She was also sureof a head appendage and showed it in her drawing.She also noted that other drivers pulled over afterthe creature flew over the highway. This is anotherclue that Susan saw something strange flying over aremote area of South Carolina. The description itselfshows it was a living pterosaur. When I brought up this sighting on a cryptozoologyinternet forum (cryptozoology.com), skeptics werequick to offer alternate explanations: anythingexcept a pterosaur. It seems to me, however, thatthe skeptics failed to read or consider the testimonyitself, offering suggestions that contradicted whatwas in the report. (Why not read it first? Really!) The first comment included “how good a look cansomeone get of something in a moving car?” Thisskeptic seems to have only scanned the report oronly read my brief comment on it, for theeyewitness described the creature: “as big as anycar.” She also estimated that it flew about 20 feethigh and about 25 feet in front of her car. And thedescription itself (it includes many details) showsthat she did indeed get a good look at the creature.Not all comments were from skeptics but thegeneral tone from most of them was that nopterosaur can live anywhere in South Carolina,therefore there must be a problem with a sightingreport that suggests a large pterosaur flew over ahighway in South Carolina. They rejected the reportbecause of their preconceived ideas about pterosaurextinctions. It was almost like they said, “Nobody’sseen a pterosaur or somebody would’ve seen one,”which would have been obvious circular reasoning.Pterosaur Seen in South CarolinaCopyright 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 Jonathan David WhitcombLive PterosaurRiver in South Carolina(Photo by “Let Ideas Compete”) San Joaquin Wildlife Sanctuary, Southern CaliforniaIntroduction to the sighting and the controversyWhitcomb is a living-pterosaur expert and author of the nonfiction books Searching for Ropens and Live Pterosaurs in America (both in revised editions)Consider Paul Nation’s 2006expedition on the mainlandof Papua New Guinea. Hesaw the indava-light severaltimes and videotaped twoindava lights on a ridge.First Nonfiction BookJonathan Whitcomb wrote"Searching for Ropens"(now in its second edition)after he traveled to PapuaNew Guinea to interviewcredible native eyewitnesseson Umboi Island. This bookis nonfiction: a true story. Deep in the oceans, manycreatures [fish, squid, etc] usebioluminescence for variouspurposes. On the land, perhapsthe best known case is in theabdomen of the firefly. . . .About two thousand species offireflies [fly] in the world. Eachbioluminescent species has itsown pattern.BioluminescenceWooten wrote under her sketch “Definitely nofeathers -- this thing was not only huge but waspractically on top of me -- maybe 20 ft? above &25 ft? in front of me > crossing highway” The above sketch is by Susan Wooten, eyewitnessof the South Carolina pterosaur. Note similaritiesto the Hodgkinson “pterodactyl” sighting (1944,Finschhafen area of New Guinea). This South Carolina sighting may relate to theMarfa Lights of Texas, but as of late 2010 theevidence for Marfa Lights being nocturnalbioluminescent flying predators is only indirect,even though the circumstantial evidence has beenaccumulating dramatically through March, 2011.Nevertheless, the creature Wooten saw flying overthe highway was nothing like any “huge crane oregret.” Common sense insists it was a pterosaur. Learn more about living pterosaurs, what someeyewitnesses might call “dinosaur birds.” Expedition of 2006Learn much more about the South Carolina sighting. Read the non-fiction cryptozoology book by Jonathan Whitcomb: Live Pterosaurs in America (third edition). Delight in details: many sightings across the United States of America: astonishing true accounts of living pterosaurs in many states of the USA.Cryptozoology & Pterodactyls “People think that these are flyingdinosaurs, but scientists notice theydiffer from dinosaurs.”Ropen and South Carolina SightingThis flying creature resembles the ropenof Papua New Guinea, at leastsomewhat, but this “pterodactyl” is alsocalled the “South Carolina pterosaur.” Sketch by the eyewitness Eskin Kuhn: oneof two pterosaurs he observed in CubaThe original version of this web page was on the old Prodigy site, before the host discontinued PWP supportConsider these book reviews on strange and paranormal phenomena:near death experiences (NDE) and eyewitness accounts of living pterosaursand dinosaurs (books by George Ritchie, Betty Eadie, F. Silcock, and Whitcomb).By the end of the 20th Century, the living Coelacanth wasno longer considered very strange. The origin of the ideaof the ancient Coelacanth, however, is strange. Believingin a living Coelacanth, why should we not consider aliving pterosaur? And if these two kinds of creaturesstill live, why consider them “ancient?” Consider that.Marfa Lights Explained